MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412804081 · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100279

Unraveling trauma memory: Differential functional connectivity profiles of anterior and posterior hippocampus in post-traumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype

2025· article· en· W4412804081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroimage Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonHomewood Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityVector InstituteWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWestern UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityCanadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health ResearchInnovation for Defence Excellence and Security
KeywordsHippocampal formationPsychologyRecallNeuroscienceDissociativeHippocampusTraumatic memoriesTraumatic stressEpisodic memoryTraumatic brain injuryAutobiographical memoryEffects of stress on memoryCognitionCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryMemory consolidation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has long been viewed by many as a disorder of memory. Consequently, the hippocampal brain networks have been an important focus of research on the neural circuitry of PTSD given its core involvement in episodic memory and mechanisms underlying traumatic memory. The primate hippocampus is functionally divided along its long axis into the anterior (aHipp) and posterior parts (pHipp), with the anterior portion playing a greater role in emotion-related memories, while the posterior region is more involved in cognitive and spatial processing. This suggests that the aHipp may be more actively involved in PTSD. Critically, however, little research has investigated the differential involvement of these hippocampal subregions in PTSD, and most research in this area has been conducted during rest rather than during the active recall of traumatic or extremely emotional memories. It is an open question whether anterior and posterior hippocampal regions might play differential roles during trauma-related memory recall. Here, we addressed this question by investigating the activity and the whole-brain functional connectivity of the aHipp and pHipp during the recall of traumatic/moral injury (MI) related trauma memories versus neutral memories in three groups: those with PTSD without dissociative symptoms, referred to as PTSD (DS-; n = 49), those with the dissociative subtype, referred to as PTSD (DS+; n = 19), and trauma-exposed healthy controls (n = 36). Both anterior and posterior hippocampal subregions displayed abnormal functional connectivity with various brain regions in PTSD (DS+) during trauma memory recall, with the pHipp showing more extensive abnormalities compared to the anterior part. For example, the pHipp showed abnormal functional connectivity with areas such as the anterior cerebellum, the parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, sensorimotor cortex, and early visual areas of the occipital lobe in PTSD (DS+) compared to PTSD (DS-) and controls during the recall of traumatic/MI memories. Collectively, these results suggest differential involvement of the anterior and posterior hippocampus in the recall of traumatic memories in traumatic/MI-related PTSD and its dissociative subtype, which may relate to the decontextualized and fragmented nature of traumatic memories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it