MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412805254 · doi:10.62848/bjpain.v4i1.5764

Treatment of Knee Joint Osteoarthritis with Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation and Platelet Rich Plasma in a Patient with Turner’s Syndrome: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4412805254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Navin Kumar K, Minal Chandra, Sudheer Dara

Bibliographic record

VenueBangladesh Journal of Pain. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlatelet-rich plasmaOsteoarthritisMedicineRadiofrequency ablationKnee JointAblationSurgeryPlateletInternal medicinePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major disabling disease in the world. Non-surgical therapeutic options are analgesics and physiotherapy, which are ineffective. So the newer modality of treatment is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of genicular nerves and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) along with physiotherapy and short-term analgesics is a more effective nonsurgical treatment. In this case, a middle-aged female with a known case of Turner’s syndrome, presented with severe pain in both knees and was subsequently diagnosed with Knee OA. We treated the patient with genicular nerve RFA and PRP. Following the procedure, pain intensity was reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 in the right knee and 8/10 to 1/10 in the left knee measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) reduced from 85% to 8% in the right knee and 70% to 5% in the left knee. Along with RFA and PRP, we advised the patient to do physiotherapy and weight reduction to have long-lasting effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBangladesh Journal of Pain.Same topicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207