MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412805372 · doi:10.1016/j.enbenv.2025.07.003

Development and validation of a thermal comfort model for sleeping environments

2025· article· en· W4412805372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Built Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersInfrastructure CanadaNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsThermal comfortComputer scienceGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep is a vital component of a healthy lifestyle and plays a crucial role in maintaining overall well-being. Comfortable environments are known to promote better sleep quality, which, in turn, enhances cognitive performance, emotional regulation, and physical health and performance during wakefulness. While numerous studies have explored sleep physiology and its intricate relationship with thermoregulation, predictive models specifically addressing sleep comfort remain limited. Yet, such models are essential for informing the design of optimal sleeping environments in buildings. This paper adapts the general Metabolic-based Predicted Mean Vote (MPMV) comfort model for wakefulness to develop and validate a new model tailored to sleep comfort for both young and older adults. The proposed model modifies the coefficients related to regulatory sweating and non-shivering thermogenesis to reflect the distinct thermoregulatory responses during sleep. Experimental data of thermal sensation votes from published studies conducted in climatic chambers and field studies were collected for the model validation. The proposed model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) values ranging from 0.30 to 0.44. For comparison purposes, the predictions of Fanger’s PMV model were also included in the study and resulted in a reasonable accuracy, particularly in the comfort range (PMV within ±1), but with higher overall RMSE values between 0.55 and 0.58. Application of the proposed model to a clothed body in typical summer and winter conditions in urban residences revealed nonlinear relationships between sleep comfort and ambient temperature. Notably, the model indicated lower sensitivity to cold conditions compared to warm ones, due in part to the buffering effect of the bedding microclimate between the human body and exterior environment. In practice, this finding could be used to alleviate some sleep disorders that are more sensitive to warm conditions by lowering environmental temperatures with proper beddings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it