MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Low Maternal Care, Low Protection and Body Image Dissatisfaction Predict the Risk of Binge Eating Disorder During the Transitional-Age Youth

2025· preprint· en· W4412814012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emanuela Bianciardi, Rossella Mattea Quinto, Ester Longo, Valentina Santelli, Lorenzo Maria Contini, Alberto Siracusano, Cinzia Niolu, Giorgio Di Lorenzo

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyBinge eatingClinical psychologyPsychiatryEating disordersDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Binge eating disorder (BED) often begins in late adolescence or early adulthood i.e. the transitional age, a major life transition period between the ages of 18 and 25, when the emerging youth struggles with internal and interpersonal challenges, such as autonomy and dependence on parents. The aim of this study was to explore potential predictors of the risk of binge eating disorder that are relevant during the transition phase, such as dissatisfaction with body shape, alexithymia, depression, attachment style in close relationships, and parental bonding. Materials and methods: A total of 287 participants aged between 18 and 25 years completed a sociodemographic data sheet and self-report questionnaire: Binge Eating Scale (BES), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ), and Parental Bonding Instruments (PBI). Results: Compared to controls, participants with BED showed higher levels of Body Mass Index (BMI), alexithymia body dissatisfaction, insecure attachment style, and recall of lower paternal and maternal care. A hierarchical binary logistic regression was carried out to examine the effects of sociodemographic and psychological variables on increasing risk of binge eating disorder. The final model explained the 56.1% (Nagelkerke R2) of variance and correctly classified 92.1% of the cases. Body dissatisfaction (OR = 1.036, 95%CI = 1.019-1.054, p < .001), BMI (OR =1.155, 95%CI = 1.013-1.317, p = .031), and two dimensions of maternal bonding (i.e., maternal care: OR = 0.911, 95%CI = 0.834-0.995, p = .039, and maternal overprotection: OR = 0.895 , 95%CI = 0.806-0.994, p = ,039) emerged as significant predictors of BED. Discussion: This is the first study to explore risk factors of BED during the transition phase. A higher BMI, dissatisfaction with body image, and a neglectful mother in terms of care and protection are risk factors specific to this critical stage. Treatment of binge eating disorders may benefit from a combination of preventive interventions targeting parenting style, psychoeducation for nutritional skills, and integrated therapeutic strategies for eating disorder symptoms and attachment functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.org→Same topicEating Disorders and Behaviors→French-language works237,207→