MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412815331 · doi:10.5376/jeb.2025.16.0010

Research on the Development of High-Value-Added Bioproducts Based on Cordyceps Residues

2025· article· en· W4412815331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Bioscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioproductsValue (mathematics)Biochemical engineeringChemistryBiotechnologyBiologyComputer scienceEngineeringBiofuel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the by-products remaining after the processing of Cordyceps sinensis , exploring their potential applications in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. The residues contain biologically active compounds such as cordyceps polysaccharides, cordycepin, and other physiologically effective substances, which have demonstrated antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-aging properties. The research further examines the use of cordyceps residues as additives in animal feed. Through techniques such as solid-state fermentation and microbial biotransformation, the structural composition of the residues can be modified to enhance nutrient bioavailability. Despite their potential, several challenges remain in the effective utilization of cordyceps residues. However, advances in biotechnology—including enzyme-assisted extraction and precision fermentation—are gradually addressing these limitations. Integrating modern technologies with traditional cordyceps cultivation practices may improve resource efficiency and promote the sustainable, circular development of the cordyceps industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy BioscienceSame topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207