The Role of the Creatine Phosphate System in Energy Storage and Release: From Molecular Mechanisms to Physiological Functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The creatine phosphate system helps process energy in cells, especially in tissues that require a lot of energy and change quickly, such as muscles and brains. This study mainly talks about how the creatine phosphate system works, its basic principles, the pathways involved, and its role in the body. We focused on creatine kinase, which helps cells regenerate ATP, and also plays a role in "storing" energy, and is even responsible for transmitting energy to where it is needed. This process is very critical during muscle contraction and brain function, especially in those organs that use a lot of energy, it can help cells maintain a stable energy state. The article also mentioned that supplementing creatine phosphate may help some diseases, such as muscle diseases and neurodegenerative diseases. Now, because of the increasing advancement of technologies such as molecular imaging and bioinformatics, people have a deeper understanding of how creatine is metabolized and how it cooperates with other cellular processes. In the future, researchers may try to develop some new therapies related to creatine. We will continue to explore how it is regulated at the molecular level and see how it is related to other metabolic pathways. These studies are expected to bring new ideas and treatments for treating some energy-related diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".