MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412816310 · doi:10.26418/lkuntan.v8i2.94493

Analisis Pola Pertumbuhan, Faktor Kondisi dan Eksploitasi Madidihang (Thunnus albacares) yang Didaratkan di TPI Linau Kabupaten Kaur

2025· article· id· W4412816310 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Muqsit, An Nisa Nurul Suci, Akbar Abdurrahman Mahfudz, Ana Ariasari, Nur Lina Maratana Nabiu, Zamdial Zamdial, Benny Pabio Pratama, Silvi Syukhriani, Zerli Selvika, Alfiqi Maulana

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Laut Khatulistiwa · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquatic life and conservation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThunnusChemistryEnvironmental scienceBiologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Tuna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ikan Tuna Sirip Kuning merupakan jenis ikan yang penting secara ekonomi, menyebar hampir ke seluruh perairan Indonesia termasuk Perairan Kaur. Salah satu parameter terkait upaya pemanfaatan berkelanjutan adalah pola pertumbuhan dan eksploitasi, faktor ini merupakan salah satu aspek dalam memperkirakan kondisi populasi ikan Tuna Sirip Kuning di perairan yang meliputi perkiraan usia, pertumbuhan, dan kematian. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengidentifikasi aspek biologis termasuk distribusi ukuran, parameter pertumbuhan dan laju eksploitasi ikan Tuna Sirip Kuning yang di daratkan di Kabupaten Kaur. Penelitian dilakukan pada September 2022 - Agustus 2023. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan di TPI Linau, Kabupaten Kaur. Data meliputi panjang dan berat ikan. Ikan Tuna Sirip Kuning diperoleh 275 sampel ikan tuna sirip kuning dengan interval kelas 68-193 cmFL. Hubungan antara panjang dan berat badan termasuk dalam alometrik negatif 2,91 dengan nilai faktor kondisi (Kn) 123-1,45. Parameter pertumbuhan menunjukkan nilai panjang asimtotik (L∞) 194,25 cmFL, dengan nilai koefisien pertumbuhan (K) 0,33 tahun-1 dan nilai Lc 146 cm. Perkiraan tingkat kematian dan eksploitasi adalah total kematian (Z) 1,11 tahun-1, mortalitas alami (M) 0,48 tahun-1, mortalitas akibat penangkapan (F) 0,63 tahun-1, tingkat eksploitasi (E) 0,57 tahun-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Laut KhatulistiwaSame topicAquatic life and conservationFrench-language works237,207