MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412816390 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/adf612

Design, modeling, and optimization of a stepped-beam piezoelectric energy generator under friction-induced vibration

2025· article· en· W4412816390 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Xiao, Qinkai Han, Nan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPiezoelectricityVibrationGenerator (circuit theory)Beam (structure)AcousticsMaterials scienceStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A stepped-beam piezoelectric energy generator (PEG) is proposed to harness energy from friction-induced vibration. First, a mathematical model incorporating beam vibration theory, friction model, and piezoelectric equation is developed to describe the dynamics of the system. The energy output of the PEG is evaluated by transient charging simulation, which is validated by experiment in previous literature. A piezoelectric stepped beam prototype is fabricated, and experimental tests under different conditions are conducted to validate the model. Subsequently, a convolutional neural network—long short-term memory neural network is proposed and trained with simulation data, functioning as a surrogate model for predicting the charging process. The well-trained model is used as the fitness function, and genetic algorithm (GA) is employed for parameter optimization. Optimizations under constant total mass (CTM) and varying total mass (VTM) conditions are conducted. The thickness of different sections <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is selected as the tuning parameter. Improvements in energy output are achieved when comparing the best and worst fitness values, validating the feasibility of using GA for optimizing the geometry. With a 10% variation ratio and friction locations <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 0.09, 0.18, and 0.27 m, the results under CTM exhibit improvements of 42.9%, 30%, and 37.3%, while the results under VTM show improvements of 24.4%, 15.0%, and 23.2%. Further improvement can be achieved by further tuning the variation ratio and incorporating additional parameters. A potential application in wind energy harvesting and sensing is demonstrated, and the results indicate the feasibility of simultaneous energy harvesting and sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Materials and StructuresSame topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207