Peningkatan Kesadaran Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Islam Melalui Edukasi Lingkungan Sosial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter Life Crisis (QLC) is a psychological phenomenon that commonly occurs in early adulthood, including college students, and is characterized by confusion, social pressure, and anxiety about the future. Students of the Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Study Program are a vulnerable group to QLC, primarily if a healthy social environment does not support them. This activity aims to increase student awareness of the importance of building a positive social environment when facing the challenges of adult transition. The implementation of the activity was carried out in the form of psychoeducation based on the results of quantitative correlational research on 111 PAI students at the Islamic University of Riau. The study showed that the social environment significantly influences QLC with a significance value of 0.001, an influence contribution of 52.5% (moderate category), and a strong correlation of 72.5%. These results are the basis for implementing educational activities through group discussions, social reflection, and independent counseling to increase students' adaptability to environmental dynamics. Thus, this activity is expected to be able to strengthen students' mental readiness and form a collective awareness of the importance of social support in facing QLC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".