BioTransformer 4.0 a comprehensive computational tool for small molecule metabolism prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BioTransformer 4.0, the successor to BioTransformer 3.0, is a freely available in silico metabolism prediction tool. It integrates both knowledge-based and machine learning approaches to predict metabolites for small molecules using one of seven modules: abiotic, environmental, CYP450, phase II, enzyme commission-based, human gut microbial, and all human metabolism. It also provides a customizable sequence prediction module that allows users to simulate multi-step metabolic transformations by chaining among the first six different modules. BioTransformer 4.0 can make predictions more efficiently and accurately than the previous version, as it includes more than 130 new reaction rules, and also an optional validation module to improve the efficiency by restricting the number of predicted metabolites, due to their similarity among real human metabolites. We evaluated its performance by running the six-step all-human metabolism prediction on the DrugBank dataset of 2,457 known biotransformations, and the PhytoHub dataset of 633 known biotransformations – achieving recall values of 87.2% (resp., 91.6%) for the DrugBank (resp., PhytoHub) datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".