MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412819126 · doi:10.69673/gar5pf89

Upaya Meningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA dengan Penggunaan E-Module dan Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom

2024· article· id· W4412819126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal in Teaching and Education Area · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlipped learningMathematics educationPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini mengusulkan penerapan Flipped Classroomdan E-Module sebagai pendekatan inovatif untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran IPA. Permasalahan yang terjadi disekolah ini didapatkan nilai siswa yang cenderung rendah dari ketetapan ketuntasan minimal. Sehingga, peneliti menerapkan penelitian tindakan kelas di kelas VII SMP Laboratorium Percontohan UPI sebanyak 25 siswa. PTK ini dijalankan sebanyak 1 siklus dengan menggunakan model McTaggart. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Flipped Classroom dan E-Module secara signifikan meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, dengan model ini memfasilitasi keterlibatan siswa, meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah, dan memungkinkan siswa untuk belajar secara mandiri dan aktif. Dengan demikian, Flipped Classroom dan E-Module menawarkan pendekatan yang efektif dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran IPA di tingkat pendidikan menengah pertama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it