MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412823080 · doi:10.1016/j.mito.2025.102075

Role of Prohibitins as Guardians of mitochondrial homeostasis

2025· review· en· W4412823080 on OpenAlex
Sabrina Champsi, David A. Hood

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMitochondrion · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMitophagyCell biologyBiologyMitochondrionBiogenesisOrganelle biogenesisMitochondrial biogenesisHomeostasisGeneticsAutophagy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondria are complex organelles critical to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Central to this regulation are Prohibitins (PHBs), a novel set of proteins involved in several mitochondrial quality control pathways, including protein folding, biogenesis, and mitophagy. PHBs mediate various cellular responses including cell survival and myogenesis, suggesting that their roles are intricate and multifaceted. While evidence suggests that PHBs facilitate mitochondrial homeostasis, their exact mechanism of action remains unclear. Elucidating the precise mechanisms driving PHB-mediated adaptations will ultimately enable the development of therapeutic strategies aimed towards the treatment of age-related diseases, characterized by mitochondrial perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it