MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412823271

IMPACT OF EPILEPSY DEVELOPMENT ON COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN STROKE SURVIVORS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT ANALYSIS.

2025· article· en· W4412823271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frenki Gjika, Ameer Khamise, Ereida Rraklli, Reem Diab, Grace Scopes, O Çibuku

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyCognitionRetrospective cohort studyStroke (engine)CohortMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy frequently occurs as a neurological complication post-stroke, substantially impacting survivors' quality of life and prognoses. However, the precise incidence and cognitive consequences of post-stroke epilepsy remain underexplored. Understanding these aspects is critical for informing clinical management strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the incidence of epilepsy and its cognitive implications among 74 stroke survivors treated at the Regional Hospital of Berat from 2020 to 2023. Participants were assessed for epilepsy development during a three-year follow-up period, with relevant demographic and clinical data collected. Cognitive function was evaluated using standardized tests, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with post-stroke epilepsy, while repeated measures ANOVA assessed cognitive changes over time. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 21.6% of stroke survivors developed epilepsy, with an average age of onset at 61.5 years and a median time from stroke to epilepsy diagnosis of 8.5 months. Logistic regression identified older age at stroke onset (p=0.012), hemorrhagic stroke subtype (p=0.024), prior stroke history (p=0.004), and cortical involvement (p=0.047) as independent predictors of epilepsy development. Stroke survivors with epilepsy exhibited significantly poorer cognitive performance across memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed domains compared to those without epilepsy. Over time, the epilepsy group experienced a significant decline in MMSE scores from 25.6 to 22.1 (p<0.001) and MoCA scores from 20.4 to 17.6 (p<0.001), while non-epilepsy group scores remained relatively stable. A significant interaction effect between epilepsy status and time (p<0.001) highlighted the cognitive decline associated with epilepsy onset. CONCLUSION: The study underscores the critical importance of early identification and management of epilepsy in stroke survivors to mitigate cognitive decline. Understanding the risk factors for post-stroke epilepsy and its cognitive consequences can guide targeted interventions aimed at preserving cognitive function and enhancing the overall well-being of stroke survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→