MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412830730 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202533303004

Cryogenic Systems for the TUCAN EDM Experiment

2025· article· en· W4412830730 on OpenAlexafffund
J. W. Martin, B. Algohi, David Anthony, L. Barrón-Palos, Melanie Bradley, A. Brossard, Tung Thanh Bui, J. Chak, Charles A. Davis, R. de Vries, K. Drury, Derek Fujimoto, R. Fujitani, Michael Gericke, P. Giampa, Robert Golub, T. Hepworth, Takashi Higuchi, Go Ichikawa, Shusaku Imajo, A. Jaison, B. Jamieson, M. Katotoka, S. Kawasaki, Masaaki Kitaguchi, W. Klassen, E. Korkmaz, E. Korobkina, M. Lavvaf, T. Lindner, N. Lo, S. Longo, Kirk W. Madison, Y. Makida, John Malcolm, J. Mammei, R. Mammei, C. Marshall, Mark McCrea, E. Miller, Meredith Miller, K. Mishima, T. Mohammadi, Takamasa Momose, T. Okamura, H. J. Ong, Rajiv Patni, R. Picker, W. D. Ramsay, W. Rathnakela, Jun Sato, Wolfgang Schreyer, Tatsushi Shima, Hirohiko M. Shimizu, S. Sidhu, Shawn Stargardter, Phyllis Switzer, I. Tanihata, S. Vanbergen, W. T. H. van Oers, Yutaka Watanabe, A. Zahra, M. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of SaskatchewanTRIUMFSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersCanada Research ChairsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMurata Science Foundation
KeywordsEngineeringEngineering physicsPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TUCAN (TRIUMF UltraCold Advanced Neutron) Collaboration is completing a new ultracold neutron (UCN) source. The UCN source will deliver UCNs to a neutron electric dipole moment (EDM) experiment. The EDM experiment is projected to be capable of an uncertainty of 1 × 10−27 ecm, competitive with other planned projects, and a factor of ten more precise than the present world’s best. The TUCAN source is based on a UCN production volume of superfluid helium (He-II), held at 1 K, and coupled to a proton-driven spallation target. The production rate in the source is expected to be in excess of 107 UCN/s; since UCN losses can be small in superfluid helium, this should allow us to build up a large number of UCNs. The spallation-driven superfluid helium technology is the principal aspect making the TUCAN project unique. The superfluid production volume was recently cooled, for the first time, and successfully filled with superfluid helium. The design principles of the UCN source are described, along with some of the challenging cryogenic milestones that were recently passed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207