MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412832550 · doi:10.1002/9781394300105.ch12

Modeling and Simulation of Water Desalination Systems Using <scp>TRNSYS</scp>

2025· other· en· W4412832550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdelfatah Marni Sandid, Essam Rabea Ibrahim Mahmoud, M. Bassyouni, Yasser Elhenawy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSDesalinationEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMeteorologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter presents a comprehensive analysis of thermal desalination systems modeled using TRNSYS software, focusing on air-gap membrane distillation (AGMD) and flat-plate solar collectors under various climatic conditions. The AGMD pilot plant utilizes a membrane surface area of 14.4 m 2 in Port Said, Egypt. Different heat exchanger fluids such as water, ethylene glycol, and a water–ethylene glycol mixture were tested. The solar collectors were analyzed in hot (Adrar, Algeria), warm (Port Said), and cold (Whitehorse, Canada) climates. The results showed that the effect of climatic conditions was notable, with Adrar achieving a maximum distillate water production of 18.08 L/h, compared to Port Said's 12.74 L/h and Whitehorse's 4.12 L/h. In addition, the higher heat capacity of ethylene glycol improved heat transfer and increased production by 27.7%. Furthermore, increasing heat exchanger efficiency from 20% to 90% raised distillate production from 7.63 to 40.63 L/h. Therefore, this study highlights the impact of fluid choice and local climatic conditions on enhancing desalination system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207