Impact of Adverse Mobility Ratio on Oil Mobilization by Polymer Flooding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymer flooding is a widely used enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method for improving energy efficiency and reducing the carbon footprint of oil production. Optimizing polymer concentration is critical for maximizing recovery while minimizing economic and environmental costs. Here, we present a systematic experimental study which shows that even very low concentrations of polymers yield relatively high recovery rates at adverse mobility ratios (230 cP oil). A series of core flood experiments were conducted on Bentheimer sandstone rock, with polymer concentrations ranging from 40 ppm (1.35 cP) to 600 ppm (10.0 cP). Beyond a mobility ratio threshold, increasing polymer concentration did not significantly enhance recovery. This plateau in performance was attributed to the persistence of viscous fingering and oil crossflow into pre-established water channels. The study suggests that low concentrations of polymer may mobilize oil at high mobility ratios by making use of the pre-established water channels as transport paths for the oil and that the rheology of the polymer enhances this effect. These findings enable reductions in the polymer concentration in fields with adverse mobility ratios, leading to substantial reductions in chemical usage, energy consumption, and environmental impact of the extraction process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".