MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412842005 · doi:10.1017/s1047951125101212

Comparisons of right ventricular strain between repaired tetralogy of fallot and isolated pulmonary regurgitation

2025· article· en· W4412842005 on OpenAlexaff
George C. Slim, Joseph J. Pagano, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Michelle Noga, Edythe Tham

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology in the Young · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetralogy of FallotMedicinePulmonary regurgitationCardiologyInternal medicineRegurgitation (circulation)Strain (injury)Pulmonary valvePulmonary Valve InsufficiencyStenosisMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonanceRadiologyHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pulmonary regurgitation leading to right ventricular enlargement may occur after repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) or balloon dilation for pulmonary valve stenosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) guidelines to identify the timing of valve replacement in rTOF are not necessarily applicable to isolated pulmonary regurgitation. This study aims to compare deformation parameters of isolated pulmonary regurgitation and rTOF at comparable right ventricular volume loads. Methods: Adopting a quantitative retrospective analytic framework, CMR was performed in 44 patients (0–30 years), 22 in each of the isolated pulmonary regurgitation and rTOF study arms, matched for age (±12 months), and Right ventricular end-diastolic volume z -score (±1). Right ventricular longitudinal strain/strain rate and circumferential strain/strain rate were measured. Comparisons between groups were analysed using two-tailed T -tests and one-way ANOVA. Results: Both groups showed predominance of longitudinal over circumferential strain. Circumferential strain was significantly greater in rTOF compared to isolated pulmonary regurgitation (–26.5% versus –22.3%, p < 0.05). Longitudinal strain did not differ between groups. The longitudinal:circumferential strain ratio was significantly lower in rTOF compared to isolated pulmonary regurgitation (1.24 versus 1.53, p = 0.05). Circumferential and longitudinal strain rates did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The right ventricles in rTOF demonstrate greater reliance on circumferential strain in response to increased volumes. The decrease in longitudinal:circumferential strain ratio suggests rTOF right ventricles display a greater adaptive response to the volume load than isolated pulmonary regurgitation, highlighting the importance of the relative contributions of both circumferential and longitudinal strain in order to understand the mechanisms of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary regurgitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology in the YoungSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207