MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412845518 · doi:10.1080/14765284.2025.2538934

Price predictions of scrap steel for north China via machine learning

2025· article· en· W4412845518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicGrey System Theory Applications
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrapChinaEconomicsMaterials scienceMetallurgyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historically, projections of the values of different commodities have been relied upon by governments and investors alike. This research examines the difficult task of estimating scrap steel prices, which are released daily for the north China market, utilizing data spanning the time period of 08/23/2013–04/15/2021. Predictions of this essential commodity price signal have not received adequate consideration in previous studies. Price predictions are produced here through Gaussian process regression approaches that are constructed via cross-validation procedures with Bayesian optimization techniques. With a 0.1325% relative root mean square error, the models produce rather accurate projections of prices throughout the out-of-sample testing timeframe spanning 09/17/2019–04/15/2021. Governments and investors might utilize price research models here to build informed judgments in the regional scrap steel market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it