MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412855354 · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaf203

Activity of CaMKII-expressing neurons in medial prefrontal cortex of male and female Long-Evans rats is necessary for encoding odor information and novelty recognition in an odor-based incidental memory test

2025· article· en· W4412855354 on OpenAlexafffund
Ilne L. Barnard, Dan L. McElroy, Kaylene M. Young, Dylan J. Terstege, Aiden E. Glass, Jonathan R. Epp, Justin J. Botterill, John G. Howland

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebral Cortex · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOdorNoveltyPrefrontal cortexNeuroscienceMemory testPsychologyEncoding (memory)Recognition memoryCognitionSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incidental memories encoded through spontaneous interaction with stimuli in an environment contribute to higher cognitive functions. The spontaneous Identical (IST) and the Different Stimuli Tests (DST), with objects and odors, allow for incidental memory testing using variable memory loads in rats. Here, fiber photometry and chemogenetics were used to examine the necessity of CaMKII-expressing neurons in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) for novelty discrimination in the IST and DST with odors. Male and female Long Evans rats completed 6-odor IST and DST. No differences in total exploration times or stimuli visits were observed in either test or sex. During the sample phase of the DST, a heightened response and a sustained increase in mPFC neuronal activity occurred during the first stimulus interaction. A sustained increase in mPFC neuronal activity during interaction with the novel stimulus was also observed in the test phase of the DST, but not the IST. Activation of inhibitory DREADDs expressed in mPFC CaMKII-expressing neurons impaired novelty preference in the DST, but not IST, and significantly decreased c-Fos + cells in the mPFC. Taken together, we show increased activity in mPFC CaMKII-expressing neurons facilitates novelty recognition under higher memory loads in the DST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebral CortexSame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207