MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seroprevalence and molecular identification of canine leptospirosis in and around Bangalore

2025· article· en· W4412860996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicLeptospirosis research and findings
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptospirosisSeroprevalenceIdentification (biology)LeptospiraVirologyVeterinary medicineGeographyMedicineBiologySerologyAntibodyImmunologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leptospirosis which is an anthropozoonotic disease is emerging worldwide with its zoonotic implications owing to its high prevalence in both developed as well as developing countries stemming from serovars of Leptospira. The present study was executed to estimate the seroprevalence and molecular detection of leptospirosis in and around Bangalore, Karnataka. Prevalence on the basis of Age, Gender, Breed and Season was estimated via Rapid test in conjunction with the molecular detection via PCR. Out of 100 samples screened 70 (70%) cases and 59 (59%) cases were positive by Rapid test and PCR respectively. Higher seroprevalence was recorded in the age group of 1-3 years, breed wise in Non-descripts followed by Labrador Retrievers and gender wise in Male dogs and season wise in South-west monsoon and Summer season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it