Myeloid-Derived Growth Factor-Regulated Oncogenesis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with EGFR Status and Cancer Aggressiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have transformed lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) treatment in EGFR-mutant (MT) patients, but strategies targeting wild-type (WT) EGFR tumors remain necessary. This study analyzed a diverse LUAD patient cohort with EGFR mutation statuses and wild-type profiles for ALK and KRAS to identify stage-specific biomarkers. Using quantitative proteomics and multiomics, we discovered 21 dysregulated proteins in early-stage EGFR-WT LUAD, identifying myeloid-derived growth factor (MYDGF) as a key candidate biomarker. Elevated MYDGF levels in tissue ( n = 117) and serum ( n = 196) correlated significantly with cancer stage in EGFR-WT patients but not EGFR-MT cases. Notably, a higher tumor-to-normal MYDGF ratio predicted a favorable prognosis in early-stage EGFR-WT LUAD. Functional studies demonstrated that MYDGF exerts distinct roles in cell viability and migration depending on its cellular localization and the invasive potential of cancer cells. Specifically, secreted MYDGF promoted a protumorigenic phenotype, whereas excess intracellular MYDGF appeared to suppress the oncogenic capacity of aggressive cancer cells. MYDGF knockdown and subsequent proteomic analysis provided further insights into these context-dependent functions. These findings highlight EGFR status- and stage-specific proteomic profiles in LUAD, emphasizing the importance of context-dependent biomarker assessment for personalized treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".