Hypergraph Neural Networks Reveal Spatial Domains from Single-cell Transcriptomics Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I. Abstract Spatial transcriptomics enables the measurement of gene expression while preserving spatial context within tissue samples. A key challenge is detecting spatial domains of biologically meaningful cell clusters, typically addressed using graph-based models like SpaGCN and STAGATE. However, these methods only capture pairwise relationships and fail to model complex higher-order interactions. We propose a hypergraph-based framework for spatial transcriptomics using Hypergraph Neural Networks (HGNNs). Our approach constructs hyperedges from top- K densest overlapping subgraphs and integrates histological image features and gene expression profiles. Combined with autoencoders, our model effectively learns expressive node embeddings in an unsupervised setting. Evaluated on a mouse brain dataset, our model achieves the highest iLISI score of 1.843 and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines with an ARI of 0.51 and a Leiden score of 0.60.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".