Enhancing sustainable agriculture through optimized polyculture hydroponic operating strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study develops an optimization framework to determine optimal operating strategies in monoculture and polyculture hydroponic systems considering uncertainty and disturbances. A key novelty of this work is the development of a polyculture hydroponic model incorporating interspecies nutrient interactions and dynamic environmental factors into the optimization problem, offering insights for system management and sustainability. A mechanistic nutrient uptake and growth model captures system dynamics and improves resource efficiency while accounting for parameter uncertainty and external disturbances to enhance system resilience. A case study of hydroponic polyculture soybean and tomato plants demonstrates the benefits of this approach. Results show that hydroponic systems increase yield by over 60% compared to traditional farming. Compared to monoculture hydroponics, polyculture methods reduce nitrogen consumption by 40% and increase annual profit by 3.91% per kilogram of fruit. These findings highlight the importance of nitrogen supply management and demonstrate how computational optimization can advance sustainable agriculture. • Hydroponic cultivation is a form of agricultural process intensification. • Polyculture systems offer interspecies benefits compared to monoculture systems. • Optimization framework determines optimal operating strategies under uncertainty. • Mechanistic nutrient uptake and growth models are used to capture system dynamics. • Case study of polyculture hydroponic system demonstrates improved sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".