MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412866053 · doi:10.1016/j.ajt.2025.07.956

Sex Differences in Combined Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus Risk Amongst Kidney Transplant Recipients

2025· article· en· W4412866053 on OpenAlexaff
Roxaneh Zaminpeyma, Karthik Tennankore, Amanda J. Vinson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusObesityKidney transplantInternal medicineKidney transplantationKidneyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Sex differences in obesity and diabetes populations exist. With the increasing prevalence of obesity in kidney transplant population, it is important to understand whether obesity and/or diabetes mellitus (DM), an associated comorbidity, affect outcomes post kidney transplant (KT) by sex. Therefore, our objective was to assess the association between an elevated body mass index (BMI) in patients with versus without diabetes at KT, and post-KT outcomes. We also aimed to assess if this risk was modified by patient sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Transplantation→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→