MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Netflix and Video Streaming Services on Changes in Distribution, Production, and Audience of Television Series

2025· article· en· W4412873488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilija Milosavljević, Nataša Simeunović Bajić

Bibliographic record

VenueDruštvene i humanističke studije · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Production (economics)Distribution (mathematics)Video on demandComputer scienceMultimediaEconomicsMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes key changes brought by video streaming services, with a specific focus on Netflix, in the realm of television series. Through the lens of technological determinism, media ecology theories, and the Toronto School of Communication Theory, transformations in the production, distribution, and consumption of serial content are explored. The paper highlights how digital distribution has reshaped the geographic and temporal boundaries of traditional television, enabling global access and personalized algorithm-based recommendations. Changes have also emerged in production, where high-budget series and new narrative formats have become the standard. Finally, the study explores the impact of streaming on audience behavior, including binge-watching practices and the creation of globally recognizable cultural products. The paper concludes that these changes have transformed not only the media landscape but also social practices related to series consumption, indicating a continuous process of evolution that warrants further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDruštvene i humanističke studijeSame topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207