MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412883357 · doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06139-7

Machine learning prediction of early reoperation following lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction: A PARITY trial secondary analysis

2025· article· en· W4412883357 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole J. Newman‐Hung, Akash Shah, Joseph K. Kendal, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Lauren E. Wessel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsMedicineOrthopedic surgeryResectionParity (physics)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Oncologic resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of malignant bone tumors carries a high risk of complication and secondary surgery. Given the significant morbidity associated with reoperation in systemically compromised patients, accurate risk stratification is critical to patient counseling and shared decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for prediction of reoperation within one year of lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: Using data from the PARITY trial, 54 features across 604 lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstructions were evaluated as predictors of all-cause reoperation within one year. Logistic regression (LR), Random Forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, and XGBoost were used for model building. Standard metrics of area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and Brier scores were used to evaluate model performance. Important features for the top-performing model were determined. RESULTS: Of 604 lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstructions performed in the study period, 155 patients (25.7%) underwent at least one reoperation. The Gradient Boosting model had the highest discrimination (AUROC = 0.817, AUPRC = 0.690) of the tested models and was well-calibrated. Surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, white race, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) use, and female sex were the five most important features for model performance. CONCLUSIONS: We report a well-calibrated ML-driven algorithm with high discriminatory power for the prediction of all-cause early reoperation following lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Preventing SSI remains paramount to avoiding the morbidity of reoperation after complex oncologic limb salvage surgeries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and ResearchSame topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesFrench-language works237,207