Innovative Molecules and Delivery Technologies Enabling the Future of GLP-1-based Therapies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multiple physiological effects of gut hormones in different metabolic tissues make them attractive therapeutic targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases. Currently, only glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor-based agonists and oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are available on the market. Despite their positive clinical outcomes across a range of indications, these treatments present several clinical challenges, including high costs, the need for peptide injections, and requirements for repeated administration. These limitations have driven research into improved GLP-1-based therapies, such as oral small-molecule agonists and novel drug delivery strategies based on emerging GLP-1 medicines. This article describes the challenges in clinical application and development of GLP-1-based pharmacotherapies. We review the development of oral small-molecule agonists and various drug delivery technologies, including ultralong-acting injectable technologies, continuous-acting implantable pumps, smart-acting electronic devices, nutrient-induced cell therapies, and noninvasive delivery systems. We discuss the current state of research, challenges to overcome, and opportunities to improve patient compliance and clinical outcomes. Additionally, we explore how endocrinological effects and patient-oriented needs can guide the development of advanced GLP-1 medicines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".