Submarine Topography Classification Using ConDenseNet with Label Smoothing Regularization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The classification of submarine topography and geomorphology is essential for marine resource exploitation and ocean engineering, with wide-ranging implications in marine geology, disaster assessment, resource exploration, and autonomous underwater navigation. Submarine landscapes are highly complex and diverse. Traditional visual interpretation methods are not only inefficient and subjective but also lack the precision required for high-accuracy classification. While many machine learning and deep learning models have achieved promising results in image classification, limited work has been performed on integrating backscatter and bathymetric data for multi-source processing. Existing approaches often suffer from high computational costs and excessive hyperparameter demands. In this study, we propose a novel approach that integrates pruning-enhanced ConDenseNet with label smoothing regularization to reduce misclassification, strengthen the cross-entropy loss function, and significantly lower model complexity. Our method improves classification accuracy by 2% to 10%, reduces the number of hyperparameters by 50% to 96%, and cuts computation time by 50% to 85.5% compared to state-of-the-art models, including AlexNet, VGG, ResNet, and Vision Transformer. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our model for multi-source submarine topography classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".