MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412903362 · doi:10.5539/ies.v18n4p121

Current Situation and Key Influencing Factors of Sustainable Agricultural Talent Cultivation in Higher Vocational Colleges in Hunan Province

2025· article· W4412903362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Education Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationAgricultureKey (lock)Agricultural educationHigher educationBusinessEconomic growthPsychologyPedagogyGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the current state of sustainable agricultural talent cultivation in higher vocational colleges in Hunan Province and analyzes the relationships between key factors influencing educational outcomes: Student Development (STD), Teachers’ Effectiveness and Teaching Strategies (TEET), and School Capacity (SCC). A mixed-methods approach was used, combining literature analysis, questionnaires, and open-ended interviews. Participants included 380 students, 33 teachers, and 33 administrators selected through random sampling, with 12 participants purposively sampled for qualitative insights. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA, correlation, and regression, were conducted to assess perceptions and examine the interconnectedness of key factors. The findings reveal that sustainable agricultural talent cultivation efforts are perceived to be at a medium level overall. Strengths include teachers’ professionalism, collaborations with agricultural enterprises, and resource-sharing partnerships. However, challenges such as outdated curricula, insufficient funding, limited professional development opportunities, and inadequate practical training persist. ANOVA results showed significant differences in perceptions, with teachers and administrators rating efforts higher than students (p < 0.05). Regression analysis identified TEET as the strongest predictor of educational outcomes. Qualitative findings highlighted the need for curriculum updates, increased funding, and the establishment of stronger industry partnerships. Respondents also highlighted the transformative potential of technology to enhance educational quality, engage students, and prepare graduates for innovation. These results provide critical insights into the strengths and gaps in agricultural talent cultivation, offering practical implications for improving educational programs. Addressing these challenges and leveraging institutional strengths can better align educational efforts with industry demands, fostering sustainable agricultural development in Hunan Province and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it