MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412909585 · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2025.103910

Assessing Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Radiation Therapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2025· article· en· W4412909585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramsen Ghasan Hikmet, Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Hanne Krogh Rose, Philip Rossen, Thomas Baad‐Hansen, T.B. Nyeng, Bodil Elisabeth Engelmann, Ninna Aggerholm‐Pedersen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNovo Nordisk FondenNovo NordiskAarhus UniversitetshospitalAarhus Universitet
KeywordsMedicineSoft tissue sarcomaRadiation therapySoft tissueQuality of life (healthcare)SarcomaCancer therapyRadiologyCancerInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (ESTS) are rare neoplasms treated with limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy (RT). While RT improves local control, it can be associated with late functional impairments that may affect health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). As survivorship care gains importance, understanding the relationship between functional outcomes (FO) and HR-QOL is crucial. This study evaluates the relationship between FO, measured by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and HR-QOL, assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). MATERIALS AND METHOD: A cohort study including ESTS patients treated with RT (January 2009 to October 2024) was conducted. Eligible patients completed the TESS and QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and statistical comparisons were performed to assess the association between FO and HR-QOL and to determine a clinically relevant TESS threshold for impairment. RESULTS: Of 255 identified patients, 123 were eligible, and 61 (response rate: 52%) completed the questionnaires. TESS lower-limb scores showed strong correlations with QLQ-C30 physical (r = 0.74), role (r = 0.63), and social functioning (r = 0.62). Notably, ROC analysis identified a clinically meaningful TESS threshold of ≥80, demonstrating high sensitivity (88%) and specificity (100%) for detecting significant functional impairments. Most patients reported good FO and HR-QOL, but a subset experienced severe impairments. CONCLUSION: ESTS survivors generally maintain good function and HR-QOL, but functional impairments significantly affect some patients. The identified TESS threshold of ≥80 may help clinicians monitor at-risk patients and guide early interventions. Future studies should validate this threshold and explore interventions for patients with severe impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical OncologySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207