MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412910020 · doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.316

Microstructures Causing Structural Instability: Applying Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) to Samples of Pyrrhotite Oxidation-Induced Concrete Degradation

2025· article· en· W4412910020 on OpenAlex
Michael Mengason, Stephanie Watson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron backscatter diffractionMaterials scienceMicrostructureDegradation (telecommunications)InstabilityPyrrhotiteElectron diffractionDiffractionMetallurgyOpticsPyriteEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) allows for the small-scale determination of a material's crystal structure.This complements the determination of the elemental composition of a phase by Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS).Further, mapping the orientation of the crystal at each pixel may highlight local differences even where the chemistry and structure remain the same.Here, we evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of EBSD in determining variations in the crystal structure of samples of the mineral pyrrhotite (Fe 1-x S where x is between 0 and 0.125) within and among grains before and after undergoing oxidation.Some residential foundations in Connecticut and Massachusetts cracked and crumbled due to the presence of the mineral pyrrhotite in the crushed stone aggregate used in their concrete costing homeowners $150,000 to $250,000 to replace (Fig 1A) [1].Pyrrhotite oxidizes, producing iron oxyhydroxide phases (e.g., geothite, ferrihydrite) as well as sulfate and hydrogen ions (Fig 1B).These products react with the cement paste, producing volumetrically larger phases and reducing the foundation's structural stability [2].To better understand the pyrrhotite reaction processes involved and to advance measurement techniques for these materials, NIST took multiple concrete core samples from a degraded foundation for structural testing, chemical composition, and microstructural characterization.Pyrrhotite bearing aggregate from this foundation, from the same Connecticut quarry as that used in the house, and from a separate quarry in Quebec, Canada related to pyrrhotite oxidation problems, were mounted and prepared for EBSD analysis.Pyrrhotite occurs as four common non-stoichiometric compositions based on replacing iron atoms with vacancies: Fe 7 S 8 , Fe 9 S 10 , Fe 10 S 11 , Fe 11 S 12 .Structurally, this is accommodated by elongation in the direction of the C axis of the base unit cell by some multiple: e.g., the C-axis is four times longer (4C) for Fe 7 S 8 , five times for 5C, etc.Each of these polytypes may be monoclinic, hexagonal, or orthorhombic due to small lattice distortions.The most iron-poor composition, 4C is generally monoclinic and is the ferrimagnetic member of the group.More iron-rich compositions are commonly hexagonal or orthorhombic and are antiferromagnetic.Rezvani et al. [3,4] applied EBSD to pyrrhotite analysis in ore samples, indicating that pyrrhotite showed fine variations on the scale of a few microns.Limiting patterns to samples identified as natural minerals, pyrrhotite structures 4C, 5C, and 6C were identified in the same grain.Rler et al. demonstrated that EBSD is applicable to cement clinker and ordinary Portland cement [5] and to the investigation of the degradation of concrete by the alkali-silica reaction (ASR) [6].Uwanyuze et al. looked at the preparation of samples of concrete degradation by pyrrhotite oxidation and the determination of major phases present [7].Samples were epoxy mounted using Epo-Tek 301 1 and polished using silicon-carbide papers to 1200 grit and polycrystalline diamond pastes to 0.25 m grit followed by one hour in a vibratory polisher using 0.04 m grit colloidal silica suspension.A thin coat of carbon (60 seconds versus our typical 120 seconds, to help achieve clear Kikuchi patterns) was applied, and conductive silver paint was used to provide an electrical ground path and secure the sample to the mount.Samples were analyzed on a JEOL 6700F SEM mounted with Bruker e -FlashHD EBSD using an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and beam current of 3 nA.As the different structures of pyrrhotite are very similar, a high-definition mode with the phosphor screen imaged at 1600 x 1200 pixels was used.Due to file size limitations at this resolution, only thin transects and small areas were collected.Kikuchi patterns were obtained from pyrrhotite in each sample, indicating the successful removal of polishing-induced strains (Fig. 2).Patterns were generally not obtainable from the iron-oxyhydroxide phase filling fractures (Fig. 3A).This may be due to the presence of non-crystalline phases or to very microcrystalline phases and/or multiple phases finely mixed.Reduced current and aperture to reduce spot size were tried but did not improve results.However, some weak patterns were evident in places, and this warrants further investigation.Pyrrhotite from the Quebec sample overall matched with monoclinic 4C (Fe 7 S 8 ).The fit of monoclinic 4C (ICSD-ID: 151765 or 151766) was only slightly different than 5C (ICSD-ID: 190012) in general, for example 0.92 vs. 0.98 misfit.Auto-matching used by the mapping function initially suggested significant variation in the grains but careful investigation of several points and manually ensuring all 12 lines were in place reduced the phases present down to 4C.Maps of crystal orientation at each pixel resulted in uniform directions indicating a continuous crystal.Pyrrhotite from the Connecticut quarry aggregate was also identified as monoclinic 4C with similar difficulty in discerning patterns.A hexagonal pattern for pyrrhotite 4C initially also matched frequently but, after optimization, was shown to have a higher misfit.Maps of crystal orientation were similar in consistency to the Quebec sample.Pyrrhotite from the Connecticut foundation core generally had weaker patterns.This sample was in a separate epoxy mount from the other two and this may be due to slight surface oxidation from sample handling or a different carbon coat thickness.Monoclinic pyrrhotite 4C was the primary polytype identified.In places where 5C and 6C were identified, it was more challenging to evaluate the polytype present.When unconstrained pattern searches on pixels were conducted, patterns associated with troilite (FeS) commonly matched more lines.Examining patterns across grains showed consistent directions (Fig. 3B) within the body of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it