MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412910124 · doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.446

Improved Prediction of Trimodality Therapy Response in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Deep Learning and Pathology-Optimized Expansion Microscopy

2025· article· en· W4412910124 on OpenAlexaff
Long Nguyen, Li Gao, Feifei Fu, Juncheng B Li, Dongbo Sun, José João Mansure, Wassim Kassouf, Yongxin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder cancerMicroscopyCancer therapyMedicinePathologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trimodality therapy (TMT) is considered one of the first-line treatment options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Regardless, a significant portion of patients with MIBC do not respond to this treatment, highlighting an urgent need for improved diagnostic tools [1,2]. Our study introduces a novel approach combining fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), expansion microscopy, and state of the art deep learning models to enhance the prediction of MIBC treatment responsiveness [3-8]. In this pilot study involving a small cohort of MIBC patients, categorized as responders or non-responders based on clinical local response status at follow-up; patient tissue slides were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E), and expanded tissue samples underwent fluorescent labelling using DAPI nuclear stain, wheat germ agglutinin, FISH staining with TelC and CENP-B box molecular probes. Preliminary results from the model that was trained with Magnify-processed samples showed 49% increase in area under curve (AUC) value compared to that of the model trained with images of H&E staining, along with significantly improved sensitivity and specificity metrics. The outcomes revealed that models trained on expansion microscopy images significantly outperformed those trained on conventional H&E images, with the expansion-trained model showing prominent evaluation results, indicating that the detailed cellular and molecular information captured through expansion microscopy substantially enhances the model's ability to predict treatment outcomes. Moreover, we used saliency maps and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to elucidate the features and attention of the model in predicting treatment responses, providing insights into the model's prediction capability. In conclusion, our findings suggest that fluorescent staining of multiple markers and nuclear structures, coupled with expansion microscopy and deep learning, can potentially enhance the performance of models predicting TMT responsiveness in MIBC patients. The innovative method offers a cost-effective, accessible diagnostic tool for pathologists to enhance patient care and treatment decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207