MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412910974 · doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.582

Live User-Guided Low Dose Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging

2025· article· en· W4412910974 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Pofelski, Lewys Jones, Jonathan James Prescott Peters, B. Gil, Minsu Han, Sang‐Wook Cheong, Yimei Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScanning transmission electron microscopyMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyScanning confocal electron microscopyElectron tomographyEnergy filtered transmission electron microscopyScanning electron microscopeMicroscopyTransmission (telecommunications)Conventional transmission electron microscopeOpticsNanotechnologyComputer sciencePhysicsComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron beam-sensitive materials remain a permanent challenge in scanning/transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM), requiring a drastic reduction in electron dose to minimize sample damage while maximizing the information extracted from each transmitted electron. A variety of advanced techniques have been developed to both mitigate electron beam damage and reduce the required dose for imaging. These include digital electron counting to eliminate detector afterglow and Gaussian read-out noise, multi-frame acquisition schemes, as well as subsampling methods with image reconstruction [1-3]. However, all these approaches rely on a sufficiently good initial seed of data from the sample to enable accurate alignment and/or extrapolation. In most cases, data acquisition still requires a final manual alignment step, and identifying the optimal imaging conditions under extreme low-dose conditions remains particularly challenging. In this study, we present a visual solution to assist users in the final imaging adjustments under conditions where conventional imaging modes fail to provide instant feedback. The proposed method involves borrowing from techniques already established in the scanning electron microscopy field. Here, we use DigitalMicrograph scripting to implement a continuous live rolling average, enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in real-time to the operator. Prior to data acquisition, memory is pre-allocated to store multiple frames, enabling, for example, to collect two minutes of live scanning. Then, the data seen by the user is continuously inserted into the pre-allocated stack during all navigation, search, focus and fine-stigmation operations. Simultaneously, a weighted average of the stored images running backwards into the recent past is presented to the user. This approach improves the SNR while maintaining an acceptable response speed. The image displayed can be further filtered (e.g. bandpass filter) or represented via its Fourier transform to assist the operator and obtain real-time feedback to refine key alignment settings manually (primarily focus and astigmatism). We applied this methodology to a RbFe(MoO4)2 (RFMO) material exhibiting unconventional magnetoelectricity through its coupling with ferroaxiality. Characterizing RFMO at the atomic scale is particularly challenging due to its vulnerability to electron beam exposure. After reducing the electron dose to a level where nearly no visible features were discernible, we employed the live feedback process to optimize imaging conditions before acquiring a series of 512 x 512 STEM High-Angle Annular Dark Field (HAADF) images with a dwell time of 0.9 µs. Fig. 1a shows an example of a single frame, where the crystalline lattice is barely visible. The complete dataset, consisting of 70 images, was then aligned using SmartAlign [2], and the rigid-registered result is presented in Fig. 1b. Further improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio was achieved using the template matching module from the SmartAlign plug-in, as demonstrated in Fig 1c. The resulting atomic structure closely matches the expected crystalline arrangement simulated using the py4DSTEM package [4], as shown in Fig 1d. Using the live feedback routine, the RFMO crystalline structure along the [100]h zone axis is revealed, and results will be further compared with structural models [5]. Low dose STEM HAADF of the RFMO sample along the [100]h direction. a) One single frame of the dataset. b) Sum of the 70 frames after rigid-registration c) Motif reconstruction from b) using the template matching module from SmartAlign. d) STEM HAADF image simulation of the RFMO crystal structure along the [100]h .c) and d) have enlarged insets in the lower left corners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207