MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412917118 · doi:10.3982/qe2644

Testing mean stationarity of intraday volatility curves

2025· article· en· W4412917118 on OpenAlexaff
Torben G. Andersen, Yingwen Tan, Viktor Todorov, Zhiyuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsCanadiana.orgKellogg's (Canada)
FundersShanghai University of Finance and EconomicsChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVolatility (finance)EconometricsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a test for mean stationarity of latent volatility curves using high‐frequency data. To derive the asymptotic test size and power, we establish a functional invariance principle for semimartingales under a strong mixing condition. The power properties are analyzed under alternatives featuring deterministic trends in the volatility curve dynamics. Application to S&P 500 futures data provides strong evidence of nonstationary variation in the volatility pattern, with implications for real‐time risk management and market activity measurement, including identification of spot volatility and the size of price jumps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.120
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.120
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative EconomicsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207