MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412922677 · doi:10.48077/scihor6.2025.193

Marketing strategies for the development of agricultural exports of Kazakhstan in world markets: Interregional comparative analysis

2025· article· en· W4412922677 on OpenAlex
Galiya Ukubassova, Aigul Mukhamejanova, B. Zhumatayeva, К. K. Primzharova, Alma Galiyeva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Horizons · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureAgricultural marketingBusinessRegional scienceAgricultural economicsEconomic geographyInternational tradeEconomicsMarketingMarketing managementGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present research was aimed at analysing the marketing strategies of agricultural exports and identifying effective approaches to the promotion in world markets. In the course of the work, the methods of comparative analysis of marketing strategies of leading exporting countries, research of official statistical data, assessment of the impact of international trade agreements and standards were used, as well as analysis of state export support programmes. The results of the study revealed key features of marketing approaches in different regions and the applicability to the Kazakhstan market, where wheat exports in 2023 amounted to 6.5 million tonnes, or 3.13% of the world volume of 208 million tonnes. Successful models of agro-product exports from countries such as the USA (19.8 million tonnes of wheat in 2023), Canada (22 million tonnes) and Australia (24.5 million tonnes) were studied to identify the most effective promotion tools, including branding and adaptation to market standards. The analysis showed that improving the competitiveness of Kazakhstani products required adapting strategies to the requirements of specific regions, taking into account consumer preferences and improving certification to international standards. It was noted that Kazakhstan's participation in the Eurasian Economic Union contributed to the doubling of mutual trade since 2015. The development of government export support programmes was also noted as an important factor, which also needed to be strengthened: financial and advisory assistance to exporters, modernisation of logistics (where wheat transportation costs were USD 80-100 per tonne versus USD 50-60 for competitors), and digitalisation of processes remained priorities. Based on the data obtained, recommendations were developed to improve Kazakhstan's marketing strategies for agrarian exports, aimed at optimising logistics, developing partnerships with international distributors, increasing brand awareness, and actively using digital technologies to promote products

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it