MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412925181 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.150605

Hybrid Vigenère-Hill Approach for Color Image Encryption

2025· article· en· W4412925181 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mourad Kattass, Hicham Rrghout, Hamid El Bourakkadi, Abdellah Abid, Abdellatif Jarjar, Abdelhamid Benazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer securityComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an enhanced encryption scheme for color images, combining improved Vigenè re and Hill cipher techniques.Our approach leverages two carefully selected chaotic maps, exploiting their extreme sensitivity to initial conditions for cryptographic security.The encryption process begins with RGB channel separation and vector conversion, followed by initial confusion operations generating a partially encrypted image vector.This vector is then divided into 3-pixel subblocks for subsequent processing.Each block undergoes multi-stage encryption controlled by a binary vector, employing three expanded substitution tables with optimized confusion-diffusion functions.These functions operate sequentially across pixels with chaining mechanisms between adjacent pixels.The modified Hill cipher then processes each block using an invertible matrix combined with dynamic translation vectors, effectively addressing the linearity limitations of traditional Hill cipher implementations.To enhance security, we implement an inter-block diffusion mechanism that dynamically links each block's final encrypted pixel with the next block's initial pixel through a specialized diffusion function.This design significantly strengthens avalanche effects while providing robust resistance against differential attacks.Tests on a diverse set of randomly chosen color images yielded statistical (histogram, correlation, entropy) and differential (UACI, NPCR) metrics meeting international standards, confirming our cryptosystem's robustness against known attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionFrench-language works237,207