MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412928917 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.055

Impact of Vutrisiran on Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy From HELIOS-B

2025· article· en· W4412928917 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Maurer, John L. Berk, Thibaud Damy, Farooq H. Sheikh, José González‐Costello, Caroline Morbach, Diego Delgado, Antoine Bondue, Olga Azevedo, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Ewa A. Jankowska, Lili Yang, Shaun Bender, Satish A. Eraly, Patrick Y. Jay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransthyretinCardiac amyloidosisAmyloidosisCardiomyopathyCardiologyInternal medicineRestrictive cardiomyopathyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Before the development of disease-modifying therapies for transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin I/T were recognized as independent prognostic biomarkers of mortality. This study evaluated the prognostic value of these biomarkers in a contemporary patient population and the impact of vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic that rapidly knocks down circulating transthyretin, on biomarker levels. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with baseline NT-proBNP and troponin I levels and changes from baseline at month 6 in patients from HELIOS-B and explore how vutrisiran impacts biomarkers over time. METHODS: In HELIOS-B, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 655 patients with ATTR-CM were randomized 1:1 to receive vutrisiran or placebo for up to 36 months. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events. All-cause mortality through 42 months was a secondary endpoint. NT-proBNP and troponin I were assessed as prespecified exploratory endpoints. RESULTS: Baseline NT-proBNP and troponin I levels were independently associated with risks of the composite outcome and all-cause mortality (P < 0.0001 for both biomarkers and endpoints). At month 6, increases in NT-proBNP from baseline were associated with higher risk of the composite outcome and all-cause mortality, and decreases in troponin I were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome. At month 30, the median changes from baseline of NT-proBNP and troponin I were 753 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: -8 to 2,573 pg/mL) and 9.7 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: -6.3 to 41.2 pg/mL) in the placebo arm and 118 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: -419 to 911 pg/mL) and -5.8 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: -25.0 to 10.0 pg/mL) in the vutrisiran arm. The geometric mean fold-change ratios (vutrisiran/placebo) were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.76) for NT-proBNP and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75) for troponin I (P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of associations between biomarkers and adverse outcomes support the importance of early treatment initiation and the potential for risk reduction in patients with ATTR-CM. Vutrisiran maintained stable or reduced levels of both biomarkers consistent with the benefit of treatment in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. (HELIOS-B: A Study to Evaluate Vutrisiran in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy; NCT04153149).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207