A Preprocessing Pipeline for Pupillometry Signal from Multimodal iMotion Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pupillometry is commonly used to evaluate cognitive effort, attention, and facial expression response, offering valuable insights into human performance. The combination of eye tracking and facial expression data under the iMotions platform provides great opportunities for multimodal research. However, there is a lack of standardized pipelines for managing pupillometry data on a multimodal platform. Preprocessing pupil data in multimodal platforms poses challenges like timestamp misalignment, missing data, and inconsistencies across multiple data sources. To address these challenges, the authors introduced a systematic preprocessing pipeline for pupil diameter measurements collected using iMotions 10 (version 10.1.38911.4) during an endoscopy simulation task. The pipeline involves artifact removal, outlier detection using advanced methods such as the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) and Moving Average (MA) algorithm filtering, interpolation of missing data using the Piecewise Cubic Hermite Interpolating Polynomial (PCHIP), and mean pupil diameter calculation through linear regression, as well as normalization of mean pupil diameter and integration of the pupil diameter dataset with facial expression data. By following these steps, the pipeline enhances data quality, reduces noise, and facilitates the seamless integration of pupillometry other multimodal datasets. In conclusion, this pipeline provides a detailed and organized preprocessing method that improves data reliability while preserving important information for further analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".