MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412937902 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06848-3

Optimizing FCN for devices with limited resources using quantization and sparsity enhancement

2025· article· en· W4412937902 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Faizan-Khan, Nisar Ali, Raja Hashim Ali, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Shabbab Ali Algamdi, Yunyoung Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaKing Khalid UniversitySoonchunhyang UniversityNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study addresses the optimization of fully convolutional networks (FCNs) for deployment on resource-limited devices in real-time scenarios. While prior research has extensively applied quantization techniques to architectures like VGG-16, there is limited exploration of comprehensive layer-wise quantization specifically within the FCN-8 architecture. To fill this gap, we propose an innovative approach utilizing full-layer quantization with an [Formula: see text] error minimization algorithm, accompanied by sensitivity analysis to optimize fixed-point representation of network weights. Our results demonstrate that this method significantly enhances sparsity, achieving up to 40%, while preserving performance, yielding an impressive 89.3% pixel accuracy under extreme quantization conditions. The findings highlight the efficacy of full-layer quantization and retraining in simultaneously reducing network complexity and maintaining accuracy in both image classification and semantic segmentation tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207