Nonorthogonal Multiple-Access Strategies for Direct-to-Satellite IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct-to-Satellite IoT (DtS-IoT) has the potential to support multiple verticals, including agriculture, industry, smart cities, and environmental disaster prevention. However, device transmissions are affected by intrinsic factors such as satellite trajectory, limited visibility time windows, collision messages and signal reception quality. This work introduces two DtS-IoT schemes using power domain Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in the uplink with either fixed (FTP) or controlled (CTP) transmit power. We consider that the IoT devices use LoRa Modulation to transmit data packets to the LEO satellite in orbit, equipped with a Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC)-enabled gateway. We also assume the IoT devices are empowered with a predictor of the satellite orbit. Using real geographic location and trajectory data, we evaluate the performance of the average number of successfully decoded transmissions, goodput (bytes/lap), and energy consumption (bytes/Joule) as a function of the number of network devices. Numerical results show the trade-off between goodput and energy efficiency for both proposed schemes. Comparing FTP and CTP with ALOHA for 100 devices, we find goodput improvements of 28% and 18%, respectively. For the same number of devices, we also achieved improvements of 234% and 207% when the proposed strategies are compared with Max Angle, a method that transmits at the maximum elevation angle only. Notably, CTP effectively leverages transmission opportunities as the network size increases, outperforming the other strategies. Moreover, CTP shows the best performance in energy efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".