MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412939514 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2025.3595632

Feature Fusion and Enhancement for Lightweight Visible-Thermal Infrared Tracking via Multiple Adapters

2025· article· en· W4412939514 on OpenAlexaff
Hu Xue, Zhidan Ran, Xianlun Tang, Guanqiu Qi, Zhiqin Zhu, Sin‐Chi Kuok, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersChongqing Municipal Education CommissionNatural Science Foundation of Chongqing
KeywordsInfraredFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionFusionTracking (education)Pattern recognition (psychology)OpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visible light and thermal infrared tracking combines the characteristics of visible light and thermal infrared modalities to achieve robust target tracking in all-weather and all-day scenarios. However, most existing visible light and thermal infrared tracking methods rely on either full fine-tuning or attention mechanisms, which introduce a large number of parameters and are predominantly influenced by the visible modality. This results in challenges such as high computational complexity, slower processing speeds, and limited exploitation of multimodal information. To address these issues, this paper proposes a lightweight multimodal tracking model based on feature fusion and enhancement. The model consists of a feature fusion adapter and a joint enhancement adapter, designed to integrate and refine information across modalities. It employs a dual-stream transformer encoder with shared parameters across modality branches, utilizing a frozen pre-trained foundation model to independently extract features from visible light and thermal infrared inputs. The lightweight fusion adapter combines modality-specific information, while the joint enhancement adapter refines unimodal features, introducing only 0.23M trainable parameters. Experimental results on the LasHeR benchmark demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms prompt learning and other adapter-based methods, achieving a 4.4% improvement in PR and a 3.3% increase in SR while maintaining computational efficiency. With a real-time inference speed of 28.60 FPS, the proposed method balances accuracy and efficiency effectively. The source code will be available at https://github.com/huxue/MFJA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207