MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412939791 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3595466

Spatial Temporal Compensation for Sea Ice Classification From GNSS-R Data

2025· article· en· W4412939791 on OpenAlexafffund
Weimin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsGNSS applicationsRemote sensingSea iceGeologySea ice concentrationGeodesyComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemCryosphereClimatologySea ice thicknessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes the use of a per-track normalization scheme and ancillary temporal and temperature data to improve the performance of global navigation satellite system reflectometry (GNSS-R) based sea ice classification. GNSS-R data and sea ice type labels were provided by TechDemoSat-1 (TDS-1) and National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) datasets, respectively. The delay Doppler maps (DDMs) from TDS-1 were used to compute DDM average (DDMA) observable values to which the proposed per-track normalization scheme was applied. The transformed observables with ancillary time and temperature data were provided to a random forest (RF) machine learning classifier to perform the final sea ice classifications. The purpose of this proposed method was to standardize power measurements across different TDS-1 tracks and to compensate for seasonal changes in sea ice that complicate sea ice classification. When using TDS-1 data within the temporal and geographic scope of this study, the method reported a testing accuracy of 84.86% and per-class F1 scores of 90.11%, 64.20%, and 81.59% for first-year ice (FYI), multi-year ice (MYI), and thin ice (TI), respectively. The proposed method was compared with existing methods of GNSS-R based sea ice classification and demonstrated improved or comparable performance. The proposed method shows promise, as it provides good performance while demonstrating generalizability to geographic and temporal data selection, and requires less data to train to a level comparable to established methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207