MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412939890 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2025.3595101

KAFSTExp: Kernel Adaptive Filtering With Nyström Approximation for Predicting Spatial Gene Expression From Histology Images

2025· article· en· W4412939890 on OpenAlexafffund
Hossein Farahani, Yongle Xie, Ali Bashashati

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Artificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial transcriptomics (ST), known as an expensive medical examination, plays an important role in analyzing the spatial heterogeneity of tumors. When considering the correlation between tissue morphological patterns and gene profiles, predicting corresponding gene expression from pathology images obtained from affordable biopsies is regarded as an instantaneous and cost-effective alternative. However, accurately modeling the complex and nonlinear relationship between histological features and gene expression remains challenging. Existing deep learning models often struggle to generalize on limited ST datasets due to their large and overparameterized architectures. The primary advantage of kernel adaptive filtering (KAF) lies in its ability to transform a challenging nonlinear problem arising in the original space into a linear regression problem in the higher-dimensional feature space via kernel methods. Therefore, this paper proposes a framework called KAFSTExp, which utilizes the state-of-the-art pathology foundation model UNI to extract image feature vectors, and then introduces the kernel least mean square algorithm with Nyström approximation to predict the normalized transcript counts of specific genes. Extensive experiments show that KAFSTExp significantly improves prediction accuracy while reducing computational cost and training time. KAFSTExp demonstrates consistent performance gains across multiple ST datasets, achieving relative improvements in Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 1.24% to 94.23%, with an average increase of 19.80% over the best-performing non-KAF methods. External validation and further clinical analysis confirm the generalization performance and clinical application value of the proposed KAFSTExp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207