MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412947075 · doi:10.25259/icaj_29_2024

Knowledge, Attitude and Performance Regarding Breast Self-examination among Students of Medical Institutes

2025· article· en· W4412947075 on OpenAlexaff
Rohullah Sakhi, Fazel Ahmad Muhammadi, Mohadeseh Ahmadi, Sayed Hashmat Sadat, Ismail Fazili, Muslim Muradi, Arash Nemat

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Cancer Awareness Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast self-examinationMedical educationBreast examinationPsychologyMedicineMammographyBreast cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, attitude and practice related to BSE among female students of Ibn Sina, Mellat and Jamal al-Shafa medical institutes in Kabul, Afghanistan. Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide. Breast self-examination (BSE) is an affordable and easy way to detect breast cancer early. In developing countries with existing unfavourable social, economic and cultural conditions, BSE may be the most effective tool for the prevention and timely diagnosis of breast cancer. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2023. It included a sample of 354 students selected using a stratified and systematic sampling method. Data were collected using a standard questionnaire derived from a literature review. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 software was used for analysis and descriptive statistics, and Chi-square tests were also performed. Results: Out of 354 students, 347 students (98%) participated in the study. The age range was between 17 and 40 years, with a mean of 21.0 and a standard deviation of 2.9. This study found that only 28.8% had good knowledge, 25.9% had average knowledge, and 76.7% had average attitudes toward BSE. In addition, 22.8% of the participants had performed BSE, and 11.5% had a family history of breast cancer. The majority (66.3%) had heard about BSE before. Statistically significant relationships were found between the patterns of knowledge and the field of study and academic semester (P = 0.001) and between the level of attitude and the field of study (P = 0.008), academic semester (0.003) and type of knowledge (0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that the participants had poor knowledge and average attitudes regarding BSE. Therefore, it is important to fill the gap between knowledge and practice through effective and systematic educational and media programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Cancer Awareness Journal→Same topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening→French-language works237,207→