Diamond – garnet elastic geobarometry applied to an eclogitic system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The investigation of mineral inclusions in diamonds represents a unique tool to better understand the mineralogy and composition of hidden portions of Earth's mantle and, hence, determine conditions of pressure and temperature at the time of diamond formation. Using a combination of experimental techniques and different geothermobarometric approaches, we characterized a natural diamond from Udachnaya kimberlite pipe entrapping nine inclusions; the inclusions are five garnets, three clinopyroxene and one sulfide and represent an eclogitic paragenesis. Here, we adopted, for the first time, the elastic geobarometry method to the garnet-diamond inclusion-host system to calculate the entrapment conditions for the diamond-garnet pair, resulting in 5.7(±0.3) GPa at 1154 °C. These P-T data are compared with estimates obtained through chemical geothermobarometry, employing T projection onto the local geotherm, a common approach used for eclogite xenoliths in absence of robust calibrated barometers. Our data demonstrate that elastic geobarometry for the garnet-diamond pair results to be a very reliable tool to determine the diamond formation also for eclogitic systems and this will allow to expand our knowledge on eclogitic diamonds in terms of depth of formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".