Effect of scrambler Therapy on variables related to quality of life in breast cancer patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the effect of scrambler therapy on levels of pain, stress, and depression as they relate to breast cancer patients’ quality of life. A total of 20 patients with breast cancer were chosen as a sample. We measured the short-form McGill pain questionnaire, the stress response inventory, and the Beck depression inventory both prior to scrambler therapy and after 5 and 10 scrambler therapy sessions. A paired t-test was conducted to examine the indicator changes by treatment timing. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire, The stress response inventory, The Beck depression inventory showed significant differences between the following points: before therapy and after 5 sessions, before therapy and after 10sessions, and the completion of 5 and 10 sessions(p<. 05). In summary, Scrambler therapy demonstrated positive effects on the quality of life in breast cancer patients, showing improvements in related variables such as pain, stress, and depression. These findings suggest the potential applicability of Scrambler therapy in the future bio-healthcare field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".