Risky Sexual Behavior among Adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Mini Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This mini-review explores various forms of risky sexual behavior (RSB) among adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), emphasizing the neurodevelopmental factors, family dynamics, and peer influences that contribute to these behaviors. Adolescents with BPD often experience emotional dysregulation and impulsivity, which increase their vulnerability to engaging in RSB, including promiscuity, unprotected sex, and sexting. A neurodevelopmental perspective highlights the role of brain immaturity in exacerbating impulsivity and emotional sensitivity during adolescence. Additionally, family structures, particularly emotionally abusive environments and insecure attachments, significantly contribute to the onset of BPD symptoms and related RSB. Peer influence, especially through social networks promoting risky sexual norms, further exacerbates these behaviors. Finally, RSB's detrimental impact on adolescent mental health, including increased emotional instability and vulnerability to victimization, is discussed. Future research should focus on interventions that target both familial and peer-related factors to mitigate RSB among adolescents with BPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".