MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412959485 · doi:10.2196/71671

Effectiveness of a Participatory and Culturally Tailored Learning Program for Coronavirus Prevention in Muslim Older Adults With Hypertension and Diabetes: Quasi-Experimental Study

2025· article· en· W4412959485 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sutteeporn Moolsart, Choochat Phuangsomjit nd

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Citizen journalismSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Gerontology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakDiabetes mellitusMedicineMedical educationPsychologyComputer scienceVirologyWorld Wide WebOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Respiratory infections have increased globally over time, with older adults being the most susceptible demographic. Programs based on cultures and experiences strongly correspond with useful, real-world applications. Objective: This study evaluated a participatory and culturally based learning program's effect on awareness, knowledge, and preventive behaviors regarding coronavirus and health care among Muslim older adults with hypertension and diabetes in Thailand. Methods: The quasi-experimental study used a 2-group pretest-posttest design with participants aged 60-80 years with hypertension and diabetes. The sample included 35 in the experimental group and 32 in the control group. An interactive 6-week learning program focusing on coronavirus prevention and health care was developed by incorporating Muslim cultural perspectives and Kolb experiential learning model, alongside standard care. The control group received only standard care. Data were collected via a questionnaire covering general information, awareness, knowledge, and preventive behaviors related to coronavirus prevention and health care. The content validity indices of sections II, III, and IV were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.96, respectively. The Cronbach α coefficients of awareness and behaviors were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively, while the KR-20 for knowledge was 0.86. Data analysis was conducted using the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The results indicated that, after participating in the program, the awareness, knowledge, and preventive behaviors related to coronavirus and health care among older adults in the experimental group significantly improved compared to their preprogram levels and to those in the control group, with a P value <.01. Conclusions: The program effectively improved coronavirus prevention and health care among Muslim older adults. It could be broadly applied in similar contexts and to other severe respiratory diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian/Pacific Island Nursing JournalSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207