Pathogenic variation underlying rare diseases in an Arab population: Implications for screening programs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Genetic variation underlying rare diseases in Arab populations is poorly understood limiting effective carrier screening for recessive disorders, which are prevalent because of high consanguineous rates. Methods: Using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines, we curated pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants in 1333 Arab Emirati families (346 internal cohort and 987 from the literature). We also analyzed P/LP variants in 1194 Emirati exomes, calculated allele frequencies, and estimated carrier rates for the associated recessive conditions. Results: (HGNC:34) (4.3%). Using a provisional gene list for carrier screening, based on our analysis, we estimated an at-risk couples rate of 4% to 21%, which varies across different screening panels recommended in other populations. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the necessity of identifying prevalent diseases in underrepresented populations to develop effective and equitable preventive public health measures, including premarital screening programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it