System for Drone-Based Indoor Mapping for Augmented Reality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoor Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) is essential for autonomous navigation in various applications such as architectural modeling, facility security, or factory quality control[1], but existing solutions often require significant costs including knowledge, and specialized equipment. Utilizing consumer drones (e.g. DJI Mini 3) offers a cost-effective and accessible alternative but challenges exist due to limitations in processing power and sensor capabilities. This paper introduces a real-time indoor SLAM system using a consumer drone and the provided on-board sensor with simple setup procedures building on previous simulation only studies. The proposed system operates without pre-programmed paths and does not rely on external positioning systems such as Ultra-Wideband (UWB) technology. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the system's effectiveness in mapping indoor environments, highlighting considerable improvements over traditional methods that require more complex equipment. The versatility and reliability of the proposed approach provides a foundation for actual use making it a promising tool for broader applications, lowering the barriers for accessible autonomous navigation solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".